Monthly Archives: March 2018

Mar 30, 2018 - Personal Injury

Defenses Frequently Used in Personal Injury Lawsuits

If you have never been involved in litigation before, then you may not be aware of the various arguments that can be put forth by defendants to avoid (or otherwise minimize) liability.  There are a number of defenses that you may encounter in personal injury litigation, though not all will be applicable to your case.  Whether a defense is used to avoid liability will largely depend on the particular circumstances of the case. For example, if you are bringing an action against a negligent defendant, and the defendant finds out that you suffered from a pre-existing physical condition before the accident, then they will almost certainly attempt to argue that you have no claim due to “no new injuries.” Defenses are frequently plead in the alternative.  Pleading in the alternative follows a fairly predictable format: “My client is not liable for the plaintiff’s injuries because A.  Even if A is true, then my client is not liable for plaintiff’s injuries because B.  Even if B is true, then my client is not liable for plaintiff’s injuries because C,” and so forth.  Thus, defendants may chain together a variety of arguments to avoid liability.  Each of these will have to be overcome in order to successfully recover damages. Defendants are therefore incentivized to plead as many defenses as reasonably possible. Defenses Commonly Seen in Personal Injury Litigation The Statute of Limitations Deadline Has Passed In Pennsylvania, and elsewhere, there is a statute of limitations that applies to personal injury claims.  The […]

Read More

Mar 28, 2018 - Easton Car Accident Lawyer

Securing Compensation in a Personal Injury Lawsuit Against Multiple Defendants

Popular media has created a perception of civil litigation as a one-on-one game, of sorts, in which you aggressively and exclusively pursue a single defendant.  This does not reflect the reality of litigation, however.  In many personal injury cases, there is more than one defendant who is responsible for your injuries (and who is therefore liable for damages). Suppose that you are injured in a motor vehicle collision.  Upon first impression, you may believe that the defendant-driver is the “lone defendant,” and is solely responsible for your injuries.  After the case has been more thoroughly investigated, however, you may discover that your own car was defectively designed and therefore contributed substantially to your injuries.  You would be entitled to sue both the manufacturer and the driver for damages. Multiple defendants necessarily complicate a lawsuit, but it’s worth noting that suing multiple defendants can be advantageous, too — not every defendant has sufficient assets or liability insurance coverage to pay your damages in full.  By introducing additional parties into the lawsuit, you might gain access to defendants who have the means to pay your damages, at least partially. Pennsylvania law on shared liability (and compensation) between defendants has changed dramatically in recent years.  If you’re bringing a lawsuit against multiple defendants in Pennsylvania, it’s important to have a basic understanding of the rules and how it may affect your recovery. The Old Compensation Rules in Pennsylvania In the past, Pennsylvania implemented pure “joint and several liability,” which heavily favored injured plaintiffs.  […]

Read More

Mar 23, 2018 - Product Defects

How Strict Liability Gives You an Advantage in a Product Defect Lawsuit

Product defect lawsuits can be somewhat mystifying for those who do not have prior experience with such litigation, in part because the standards for establishing liability may be unclear to the average person.  Product defect liability — in Pennsylvania and in other jurisdictions throughout the country — essentially gives the injured party (plaintiff) a right of action against the manufacturer to obtain compensation for the losses they sustained due to the particular defective product at-issue. For example, if you were injured in a motor vehicle collision as the result of defective brakes, you would be entitled you to sue the manufacturer and recover damages pursuant to Pennsylvania product defect law. Simple, right?  Not quite. Product defect liability claims may be brought on the basis of strict liability or negligence, and there are multiple theories for liability, each of which plays out rather differently — for example, if you bring a claim against a manufacturer for a product where the defect is in the design of the product itself, you will have to make different arguments (i.e., that the design was not safe for its foreseeable uses) than if you bring a claim against a manufacturer for a product that was defectively produced. Given the unique challenges presented by product defect litigation, it’s a good idea to consult with an attorney who has specific experience with such claims. In Pennsylvania, strict liability applies to product defect claims by default.  As a general rule, the application of strict liability favors the injured […]

Read More

Mar 21, 2018 - Wrongful Death

Do You Qualify to Receive Damages for the Wrongful Death of a Loved One?

Have you lost a loved one due to the conduct (negligence, recklessness, intentional acts) of another person or entity?  Pennsylvania law may give you the right to recover damages pursuant to a wrongful death claim, but it’s important to note that you must be a qualified beneficiary — in accordance with Pennsylvania statutory law — to be eligible to receive wrongful death damages. So, do you qualify? Before you can determine your status as a qualified beneficiary, it’s worth considering whether you have a wrongful death claim to begin with.  Let’s take a look at the fundamentals of a wrongful death claim. What is a Wrongful Death Claim? The regulations governing wrongful death claims are enshrined in section 8301 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes.  Essentially, a wrongful death claim is an action brought to recover damages for the losses sustained by surviving beneficiaries of the deceased, so long as the death was caused by the wrongful acts or negligence of another. Suppose that someone’s parents die in an unexpected car accident. If the car accident did not involve anyone else (there were poor weather conditions and the car slipped off the rode and collided with a tree), the child of the deceased parents would not be entitled to recover damages for losses stemming from their death. Now, if the car accident was caused by another driver who was operating their vehicle while intoxicated, then the child of the deceased parents would likely have a wrongful death claim against the defendant. […]

Read More

Mar 16, 2018 - Personal Injury

The Eggshell Plaintiff Rule in Pennsylvania Injury Lawsuits

If you have been injured in an accident that was caused by another person, you may be entitled to compensation, pursuant to Pennsylvania law.  Your ability to recover damages can be somewhat complicated, however, by the particular circumstances of your injury. In Pennsylvania, and in other jurisdictions throughout the country, those who suffer from preexisting conditions that make them more “fragile” and likely to suffer severe injury are commonly referred to as eggshell plaintiffs.  For example, if you suffer from very high blood pressure, you may be more likely to sustain a serious heart attack in the event of a stressful accident scenario.  Depending on the circumstances, you would therefore be considered an eggshell plaintiff. Despite suffering substantial losses as a consequence of their accident, many eggshell plaintiffs avoid litigating their claims, as they may not be familiar with the particularities of the law and their right to recover damages.  These plaintiffs may incorrectly believe that — because their injuries are “disproportionate” — they may not be entitled to a remedy for such injuries.  In reality, however, eggshell plaintiffs are entitled to compensation for their injuries, even if those injuries would not have occurred in a healthier person. Causation Can Be a “Fuzzy” Issue For an injured plaintiff to succeed in their lawsuit, they must show that the defendant not only acted negligently, recklessly, or intentionally, but that the conduct of the defendant was the substantial and proximate cause of their injuries.  Causation can be a fuzzy matter, in some […]

Read More

Mar 14, 2018 - Wrongful Death

What is the Difference Between a Survival Action and a Wrongful Death Action?

In Pennsylvania, when a person has died due to the negligent, reckless, or intentional actions of another, their surviving family members may have the right to recover damages pursuant to a survival action.  Though many people are familiar with wrongful death actions (recovering damages that arise from the loss of a loved one), there tends to be quite a bit of confusion regarding survival actions and what makes them unique. How Survival Actions Differ From Wrongful Death Actions Survival actions are lawsuits brought by qualified family members of the deceased to recover damages that would have been owed to the deceased had they survived.  Survival actions are governed by section 8302 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, which states that all causes of action (or proceedings) will continue after the death of the plaintiff. What does this mean, exactly? Suppose that your father has passed away due to fatal injuries that they incurred in a motor vehicle accident.  The defendant was distracted at the time of the accident, and their erratic driving caused the collision and your father’s subsequently fatal injuries.  Your father did not die immediately, however.  In the aftermath of the accident, there were weeks of treatment, which ultimately failed. Now, your father would have had the right to sue and recover damages for the losses he sustained following the accident, and before they died.  He would have been entitled to sue for pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost wages, emotional distress, and more.  Section 8302 ensures that your […]

Read More

nbta badge super lawyers badge avvo badge rising star badge Million Dollar Advocates Forum Peer Review Rated paaj champion badge NAOPIA
Drake, Hileman & Davis logo


"Unfortunately, I had a a slip and fall incident and it left me in a situation where I struggled to support my family and I really had no idea what my rights were. Thankfully, someone recommended DHD, specifically Jeremy Puglia, and it was the best decision I could have made. I was able to focus on getting better while he made certain no one took advantage of me or the situation. He listened to what I felt was fair and why, discussed it all with me and fought for me. I would NOT want to be up against him in a court room. Some people were made to defend others and he is one of them for sure!"

Drake, Hileman & Davis

Get Answers to Your Questions

Let's determine if you have a case.